So it may have been close, but there is no doubt that the winner is Nox. The winner in this test was Nox with scores around 1100 points in single-core and 2140 in multi-core, followed by MEmu and BlueStacks with similar scores around 1086 points in single-core and 2105 points in multi-core.
In this test the results were very close and consistent, however, despite the normal small oscillations and the difference between scores not being very large, the order of the scores has always remained the same in all tests. So in this respect BlueStacks takes the win. It is important to start by analyzing the starting point to see right from the start if there is a difference.Īt this point all 3 emulators have a CPU utilization of less than 1%, however, there is already a difference in RAM usage, being the winner in this case BlueStacks with a usage of only 375 MB, followed by Nox with 530 MB and lastly MEmu with 665 MB. In order to be able to match as much as possible the starting point of all emulators, the configurations used were as follows : Article published by BlueStacks : BlueStacks Versus Competitors.Article published by MEmu : MEmu vs Bluestacks vs Nox vs Gameloop vs LDPlayer.
I decided to do my own tests from a performance-only point of view, ignoring additional features since the main purpose of this comparison is to be able to advise which is the best emulator when the computer's resources are limited.
After finding some contradictory articles where the final result always depends on the interests behind the publisher who values his emulator for having 1000% more performance than the competitors,
0 kommentar(er)
